A word game to take your mind off Friday’s political reality

A politically active friend emailed to say she knows not to say “basket of deplorables,” but she wondered whether “basket of dopes” might be acceptable. I had not been impressed with Hillary Clinton’s characterization when she used it as a slur against her opponent’s followers. Setting aside the inappropriateness of commenting on people who’s views she disparaged, how does “basket” add to our understanding the characteristics of deplorables? Hillary can be brilliant when explaining policy, but her literary imagination is lacking; maybe that’s part of why she lost the election. And, with due respect to my friend, “basket of dopes” doesn’t have any wit either.

But maybe word play offered a way to assuage anxiety over anticipated consequences of the presidential election. I took An Exultation of Larks off the shelf and sat down with a pad and pencil. In case you don’t have this extraordinary reference, I photographed the cover and two pages: An Unction of Undertakers and A Sclerosis of Fast Food.

Mr. Lipton’s examples are better than mine of course, but here are a few of my collective nouns. Be a shrivel of critics. Feel free to write back with improvements on my collection or to add your own!

A poverty of know nothings

A craven of dupes

A grievance of voters

A copyright of believers

An insult of tweets or perhaps a dawn or a blackmail of tweets

A blind of ethicists

A corruption of advisers or perhaps a flattery of advisors

An injunction of liberals or perhaps a plaint or a submission of liberals

A treachery of governors or perhaps a flippancy or a hazard of governors

A hoax of climate scientists

A callous of insurers

A swamp of legislatorsĀ  or perhaps a bog or a marsh or an obstruction of legislators

A voucher of schools

An apathy of law or perhaps an impropriety of law

An insouciant of cabinet members

An imbalance of billionaires or perhaps a disinterest or a profit of billionaires

A tightness of corporations or a parsimony or a Scrooge of corporations

A party of conflicts or perhaps a family business of conflicts

An inconvenience of facts or perhaps a finesse of facts

I hope this leads to a cordite of ideas!

  1. Catharine King said:

    Love it, one of my favorite books, hadn’t thought to use it this way.

  2. David Parish said:

    A Surfeit of Sadness

    A slight antidote that I concocted:

    Ode to Trump

    And, does he know you, Sir?

    No, he knows me not.

    And, if he should?

    He would regard me not.

    He would find you inimical?

    Pernicious, doubtless criminal.

    And, how would he look upon you?

    Why, with malice, Sir, with malice.

    He would wish you ill?

    He would force a bitter pill.

    He has no generosity?

    Nor wit, nor magnanimity.

    And, how would you parry, Sir?

    Why, with song and sin and aberrant sumptuosity.

    Would this then cost him dear?

    ‘Tis his weakness, that is clear.

    And, this will win the day?

    I know not, but it may.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: